Social freedom and the test of moral responsibility

Ethics 103 (1):104-116 (1992)
Abstract
The responsibility view of social freedom views obstacles as constraints on freedom if and only if there is an agent morally responsible for the obstacle's existence or nonsuppression. However, the test of moral responsibility offered by S.I. Benn and W.L. Weinstein is too narrow, W.E. Connolly's is too broad and D. Miller's is either trivial or wrong depending on whether a permissive or narrow interpretation is adopted. A plausible definition assigns moral responsibility for nonsuppression of an obstacle when a reasonable person could have been expected to suppress the obstacle.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/293473
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Responsible Ads: A Workable Ideal.M. Hyman - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):199-210.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
212 ( #19,356 of 2,193,769 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #145,873 of 2,193,769 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature