Synthese:1-30 (2016)

Abstract
A lot of research has recently been done on the topic of ground, and in particular on the logic of ground. According to a broad consensus in that debate, ground is hyperintensional in the sense that even logically equivalent truths may differ with respect to what grounds them, and what they ground. This renders pressing the question of what we may take to be the ground-theoretic content of a true statement, i.e. that aspect of the statement’s overall content to which ground is sensitive. I propose a novel answer to this question, namely that ground tracks how, rather than just by what, a statement is made true. I develop that answer in the form of a formal theory of ground-theoretic content and show how the resulting framework may be used to articulate plausible theories of ground, including in particular a popular account of the grounds of truth-functionally complex truths that has proved difficult to accommodate on alternative views of content.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1242-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - Routledge.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-36.
On What Grounds What.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
The Pure Logic of Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (1):1-25.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Singular Troubles with Singleton Socrates.Stephan Krämer - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Ground-Theoretic Equivalence.Stephan Krämer - forthcoming - Synthese:1-41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Presuppositions and Common Ground.Barbara Abbott - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):523-538.
Ground.Michael J. Raven - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (5):322-333.
Representation and Unexploited Content.James Blackmon, David Byrd, Robert C. Cummins, Alexa Lee & Martin Roth - 2006 - In Graham Macdonald & David Papineau (eds.), Teleosemantics. Oxford University Press.
Is Ground Said-in-Many-Ways?Margaret Anne Cameron - 2014 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 7 (2):29.
The Ground Axiom.Jonas Reitz - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (4):1299 - 1317.
In Defence of Ground.Michael J. Raven - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):687 - 701.
What is Weak Ground?Louis deRosset - 2013 - Essays in Philosophy 14 (1):2.
The Possibility of Physicalism.Shamik Dasgupta - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (9-10):557-592.
An Infinitely Descending Chain of Ground Without a Lower Bound.Jon Litland - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1361-1369.
Pure Logic of Many-Many Ground.Jon Litland - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):531-577.
Is Ground a Strict Partial Order?Michael J. Raven - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):191-199.
Agamben at Ground Zero.J. McKim - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (5):83-103.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-12

Total views
131 ( #66,916 of 2,324,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #303,931 of 2,324,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes