Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):577-592 (2009)

Authors
Maria Kronfeldner
Central European University
Abstract
I argue that creativity is compatible with determinism and therefore with naturalistic explanation. I explore different kinds of novelty, corresponding with four distinct concepts of creativity – anthropological, historical, psychological and metaphysical. Psychological creativity incorporates originality and spontaneity. Taken together, these point to the independence of the creative mind from social learning, experience and previously acquired knowledge. This independence is nevertheless compatible with determinism. Creativity is opposed to specific causal factors, but it does not exclude causal determination as such. So creativity can be naturalized.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.637.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,715
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Philosophy of Creativity.Berys Gaut - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1034-1046.
Explaining Creativity.Maria Kronfeldner - 2018 - In Berys Gaut & Matthew Kieran (eds.), Routledge Handbook on Creativity and Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 213-29.
Minimally Creative Thought.Dustin Stokes - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (5):658-681.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-07-03

Total views
198 ( #45,414 of 2,386,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #105,593 of 2,386,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes