Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):577-592 (2009)
I argue that creativity is compatible with determinism and therefore with naturalistic explanation. I explore different kinds of novelty, corresponding with four distinct concepts of creativity – anthropological, historical, psychological and metaphysical. Psychological creativity incorporates originality and spontaneity. Taken together, these point to the independence of the creative mind from social learning, experience and previously acquired knowledge. This independence is nevertheless compatible with determinism. Creativity is opposed to specific causal factors, but it does not exclude causal determination as such. So creativity can be naturalized.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Darwinian 'Blind' Hypothesis Formation Revisited.Maria Kronfeldner - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):193--218.
Similar books and articles
Knowledge Governance and Creativity in the Organisation of Production: What is in the Interests of 'Publics'?Silvia Sacchetti & Roger Sugden - unknown
Structures of Consciousness and Creativity: Opening the Doors of Perception.Allan Combs & Stanley Krippner - 2007 - In Ruth Richards (ed.), Everyday Creativity and New Views of Human Nature: Psychological, Social, and Spiritual Perspectives. American Psychological Association. pp. 131-149.
The Nature of Creativity in Whitehead's Metaphysics.Robert Hanna - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:109-175.
Added to index2009-07-03
Total downloads138 ( #33,258 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #40,325 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?