Descriptivism, Pretense, and the Frege-Russell Problems

Philosophical Review 113 (1):1-30 (2004)

Authors
Frederick Kroon
University of Auckland
Abstract
Contrary to frequent declarations that descriptivism as a theory of how names refer is dead and gone, such a descriptivism is, to all appearances, alive and well. Or rather, a descendent of that doctrine is alive and well. This new version—neo-descriptivism, for short—is supposedly immune from the usual arguments against descriptivism, in large part because it avoids classical descriptivism’s emphasis on salient, first-come-to-mind properties and holds instead that a name’s reference-fixing content is typically given by egocentric properties specified in terms of broadly causal relationships between a speaker and his environment: properties like being the actual individual called ‘Aristotle’ referred to by my informants’ use of the name, being the actual individual called ‘George Bush’ whom I have seen/heard described as the U.S. President who started the second Gulf War, and so on. names is not in contention.) What these neo-descriptivists claim is that the usual modal, semantical, and epistemological arguments against classical descriptivism don’t get much of a foothold against this new version, especially if we don’t insist that speakers be able to state these properties on demand. It is enough that these are properties implicit in the semantic judgments of speakers. Recent attacks notwithstanding, such a neo-descriptivism has struck many philosophers as a credible and worthy successor to classical descriptivism.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8108  
DOI phr200411314
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,993
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fictionalism in Metaphysics.Frederick Kroon - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (11):786-803.

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frege‐Russell Semantics?Howard Wettstein - 1990 - Dialectica 44 (1‐2):113-135.
Desires, Descriptivism, and Reference Failure.Alexander Hughes - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):279-296.
Sense, Reference and Ontology in Early Analytic Philosophy.Max Langan Rosenkrantz - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Against Causal Descriptivism.Panu Raatikainen - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (1):78-84.
A Set Theory with Frege-Russell Cardinal Numbers.Alan McMichael - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 42 (2):141 - 149.
Russell And Frege On The Logic of Functions.Bernard Linsky - 2008 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 4:1-17.
Russell-Names: An Introduction to Millian Descriptivism.Stefano Predelli - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):603-622.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
173 ( #42,086 of 2,259,517 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #40,847 of 2,259,517 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature