Medicine Studies 1 (2):167-181 (2009)
This article illustrates in which sense genetic determinism is still part of the contemporary interactionist consensus in medicine. Three dimensions of this consensus are discussed: kinds of causes, a continuum of traits ranging from monogenetic diseases to car accidents, and different kinds of determination due to different norms of reaction. On this basis, this article explicates in which sense the interactionist consensus presupposes the innate?acquired distinction. After a descriptive Part 1, Part 2 reviews why the innate?acquired distinction is under attack in contemporary philosophy of biology. Three arguments are then presented to provide a limited and pragmatic defense of the distinction: an epistemic, a conceptual, and a historical argument. If interpreted in a certain manner, and if the pragmatic goals of prevention and treatment (ideally specifying what medicine and health care is all about) are taken into account, then the innate?acquired distinction can be a useful epistemic tool. It can help, first, to understand that genetic determination does not mean fatalism, and, second, to maintain a system of checks and balances in the continuing nature?nurture debates.
|Keywords||genetic determinism fatalism parity thesis norm of reaction medicine genetic disease geneticization innate-acquired distinction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality.Anne Fausto-Sterling & Edward Stein - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):203-208.
Not in Our Genes Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature.Richard C. Lewontin, Leon J. Kamin & Steven P. R. Rose - 1984
Innateness and the Sciences.Matteo Mameli & Patrick Bateson - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (2):155-188.
Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension.Eva Jablonka & Marion Lamb - 2000 - Oxford University Press UK.
'Our Posthuman Future': Biotechnology as a Threat to Human Nature.Francis Fukuyama - 2002 - fsgbooks.
Citations of this work BETA
Genes, Body Clocks and Prevention of Sleep Problems.Anders Nordgren - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (4):569-579.
Similar books and articles
Moral and Nonmoral Innate Constraints.Kathryn Paxton George - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):189-202.
What's in a Cause?: The Pragmatic Dimensions of Genetic Explanations. [REVIEW]Lisa Gannett - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (3):349-373.
Developmental Constraints, Generative Entrenchment, and the Innate-Acquired Distinction.William C. Wimsatt - 1986 - In William Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. pp. 185--208.
Fine-Tuning Nativism: The 'Nurtured Nature' and Innate Cognitive Structures.Slobodan Perovic & Ljiljana Radenovic - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (3):399-417.
Is Nativism in Psychology Reconcilable with the Parity Thesis in Biology?Slobodan Perovic & Ljiljana Radenovic - manuscript
The Innate / Acquired Distinction.James Maclaurin - 2006 - In Sahotra Sarkar & Jessica Pfeifer (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. Routledge.
The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics.Paul Griffiths - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-09-27
Total downloads197 ( #21,729 of 2,178,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,823 of 2,178,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?