Gentzen formulations of two positive relevance logics

Studia Logica 39 (4):381 - 403 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author gentzenizes the positive fragmentsT + andR + of relevantT andR using formulas with, prefixes (subscripts). There are three main Gentzen formulations ofS +{T+,R +} calledW 1 S +,W 2 S + andG 2 S +. The first two have the rule of modus ponens. All of them have a weak rule DL for disjunction introduction on the left. DL is not admissible inS + but it is needed in the proof of a cut elimination theorem forG 2 S +.W 1 S + has a weak rule of weakeningW 1 and it is not closed under a general transitivity rule. This allows the proof that A inS + iff A inW 1 S +. From the cut elimination theorem forG 2 S + it follows that if A inS +, then A inG 2 S +. In order to prove the converse,W 2 S + is needed. It contains modus ponens, transitivity, and a restricted weakening rule.G 2 S + is contained inW 2 S + and there is a proof that A inW 2 S + iff A inW 1 S +.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#331,749)

6 months
4 (#477,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Deduction Theorems for T, E and R Reconsidered.Aleksandar Kron - 1976 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 22 (1):261-264.
Deduction Theorems for T, E and R Reconsidered.Aleksandar Kron - 1976 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 22 (1):261-264.

Add more references