Philosophies of particular biological research programs

Biological Theory 1 (2):182-187 (2006)
There is a trend within philosophy of biology to concentrate on questions that are strongly related to particular biological research programs rather than on the general scope of the field and its relation to other sciences. Projects of the latter kind, of course, are followed as well but will not be the topic of this review. Shifting the focus to particular research programs reflects philosophers’ increased interest in knowledge of, and contribution to, actual biological research, which is organized in such programs. It is accompanied by the increasing enthusiasm of biologists to involve philosophers in the conceptual work of theoretical biology. I concentrate on the philosophies of four biological research programs, three of which are devoted to evolutionary biology, which is still the main field of interest among philosophers of biology: adaptationism, EvoDevo, and the developmental systems approach. In addition, a short sketch of the newly emerging philosophy of systems biology is given. Several lines of philosophical inquiry can be found in all of the fields considered here: philosophy contributes to the conceptual development of biological research programs, it analyzes structures and delineations of particular research programs, and sometimes it is involved in a comparative assessment of biological programs as well. Philosophical projects that start from the level of a particular research program may give rise to a bottom-up perspective on biology and allow for an integrative view of biological research. This may open up the opportunity to tackle “larger” questions again in an altered and fruitful manner.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/biot.2006.1.2.182
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Fitness, Probability and the Principles of Natural Selection.Frédéric Bouchard & Alex Rosenberg - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):693-712.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On the Uniqueness of Biological Research.Adolph Portmann - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (5):457-472.
Biological Pluralism and Homology.Heather A. Jamniczky - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):687-698.
Philosophy of Behavioral Biology.Kathryn S. Plaisance & Thomas A. C. Reydon (eds.) - 2011 - Springer: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 282.
“A Reexamination of Biological Information From the Perspective of Practice”.Barton Moffatt - 2009 - Society of Philosophy of Science in Practice Conference Paper (2009).
Assessing Evolutionary Epistemology.Michael Bradie - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (4):401-459.
The Methodology of Research Projects: A Sketch.Joseph Agassi - 1977 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8 (1):30-38.
Recent Developments in Computing and Philosophy.Anthony F. Beavers - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):385-397.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
25 ( #221,258 of 2,210,890 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #63,285 of 2,210,890 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature