Embryonenschutz und medizinischer Fortschritt: Ethische Probleme der Reproduktionsmedizin


For the political, the theological and church discussion about reproductive medicine and genetics in Germany it might be helpful to take a Iook on the situation in other European countries. The above article informs about the discussion in Austria, which has a law of reproductive medicine since 1992. The focus of analysis lies on the legal and moral status of the embryo. It is questionable to argue that an embryo is a person. Concerning the protection of the embryo there are general philosophical reasons but also reasons of theological anthropology which lead to a position of tutiorism. In general a strict protection of the embryo must be granted, but under certain circumstances there are valid reasons for a balance of ethical goods. Detailed questions which are discussed are new indications for in-vitro-fertilization and the ethical issues of preimplantation diagnosis, of research on embryonie stem cells and of therapeutic cloning.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

7 (#1,076,021)

6 months
1 (#386,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Embryo Research: The Ethical Geography of the Debate.G. Khushf - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):495-519.
Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.
The Status of the in Vitro Embryo.John Stewart Gordon - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):296–298.
The Morality of Embryo Use.Louis M. Guenin - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Fetal Status: Sources and Implications.T. A. Shannon - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):415-422.