Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):382-383 (1999)

Abstract
Pylyshyn could have strengthened his case by avoiding side issues and by taking a sterner, firmer line on the unresolved (and perhaps unresolvable) problems plaguing the sensitivity (d') measure of top-down, cognitive effects, as well as the general (nearly utter!) lack of convincing evidence provided by proponents of the cognitive penetrability of visual perception.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x9940202x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Case for Cognitive Penetrability.Philippe G. Schyns - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
The Cognitive Impenetrability of Cognition.Patrick Cavanagh - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):370-371.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
39 ( #257,889 of 2,403,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,954 of 2,403,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes