An even stronger case for the cognitive impenetrability of visual perception

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):382-383 (1999)
Abstract
Pylyshyn could have strengthened his case by avoiding side issues and by taking a sterner, firmer line on the unresolved (and perhaps unresolvable) problems plaguing the sensitivity (d') measure of top-down, cognitive effects, as well as the general (nearly utter!) lack of convincing evidence provided by proponents of the cognitive penetrability of visual perception.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X9940202X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,157
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Case for Cognitive Penetrability.Philippe G. Schyns - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
The Cognitive Impenetrability of Cognition.Patrick Cavanagh - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):370-371.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

21 ( #235,530 of 2,163,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,037 of 2,163,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums