Genealogy as critique?

Abstract
This essay explores whether, and how, genealogy might remain critical within anti-foundationalist philosophical contexts. While adherents of genealogy often presume that genealogy simply is inherently critical in any context, adherents of historicized forms of anti-foundationalist philosophy might rightly wonder whether genealogy can continue to serve any critical purpose whatsoever. Is genealogy a form of historical inquiry that can be done away with once a shift has been made towards historicized forms of anti-foundationalist philosophy? Why continue to do genealogies once certain generalizeable insights have been learned from genealogy? This essay argues that there remains a critical role for genealogy, understood as a particular form of historical inquiry, within anti-foundationalist modes of reasoning. By exploring this critical role for genealogy, our understanding of anti-foundationalist modes of reasoning is enriched, and some clarity is gained into the philosophical foundations of genealogical critique.
Keywords SAAR   GEUSS   ANTI-FOUNDATIONALISM   GENEALOGY   FOUCAULT   CRITIQUE   SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION   HISTORICAL INQUIRY   POST-ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/187226308X335985
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
106 ( #48,614 of 2,192,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,432 of 2,192,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature