Continental Philosophy Review 51 (2):239-268 (2018)

John Krummel
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Two major twentieth century philosophers, of East and West, for whom the nothing is a significant concept are Nishida Kitarō and Martin Heidegger. Nishida’s basic concept is the absolute nothing upon which the being of all is predicated. Heidegger, on the other hand, thematizes the nothing as the ulterior aspect of being. Both are responding to Western metaphysics that tends to substantialize being and dichotomize the real. Ironically, however, while Nishida regarded Heidegger as still trapped within the confines of Western metaphysics with its tendency to objectify, Heidegger’s impression of Nishida was that he is too Western, that is, metaphysical. Yet neither was too familiar with the other’s philosophical work as a whole. I thus compare and assess Nishida’s and Heidegger’s discussions of the nothing in their attempts to undermine traditional metaphysics while examining lingering assumptions about the Nishida–Heidegger relationship. Neither Nishida nor Heidegger means by “nothing” a literal nothing, but rather that which permits beings in their relative determinacy to be what they are and wherein or whereby we find ourselves always already in our comportment to beings. Nishida characterizes this as a place that negates itself to give rise to, or make room for, beings. For Heidegger, being as an event that clears room for beings, releasing each into its own, is not a being, hence nothing. We may also contrast them on the basis of the language they employ in discussing the nothing. Yet each seemed to have had an intuitive grasp of an un/ground, foundational to experience and being. And in fact their paths cross in their respective critiques of Western substantialism, where they offer as an alterantive to that substantialist ontology, in different ways, what I call anontology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-017-9419-3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:161-161.
Sein Und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 14 (1):57-58.
Wegmarken.Martin Heidegger - 1967 - Frankfurt A.M., Klostermann.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Chōra in Heidegger and Nishida.John W. M. Krummel - 2016 - Studia Phaenomenologica 16:489-518.
Nishida on Heidegger.Curtis A. Rigsby - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):511-553.
Nishida on God, Barth and Christianity.Curtis A. Rigsby - 2009 - Asian Philosophy 19 (2):119 – 157.
The Unsolved Issue of Consciousness.Nishida Kitarō & John W. M. Krummel - 2012 - Philosophy East and West 62 (1):44-51.
God and Nothingness.Robert E. Carter - 2009 - Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 1-21.
Nishida Kitarō’s Philosophy of Body.Ching-Yuen Cheung - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (4):507-523.


Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #171,395 of 2,508,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #276,886 of 2,508,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes