Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (6):403-404 (2021)

Authors
Jenny Krutzinna
University of Bergen
Abstract
Braun explores the use of digital twin technology in medicine with a particular emphasis on the question of how such simulations can represent a person.1 In defining some first conditions for ethically justifiable forms of representation of digital twins, he argues that digital twins do not threaten an embodied person, as long as that person retains control over their simulated representation via dynamic consent, and ideally with the option to choose both form and usage of the simulation. His thoughtful elaboration provides insight into the challenges inherent in interactions between a person and their digital twin, emphasising the modes of control required to respect personal modes of freedom. This individual-centric approach to the question of representation leaves out the important ethical consideration of ensuring that all, not merely some, can be represented. Braun describes dynamic consent as a necessary mode of control, arguing that where a person is unable to give consent, ‘such simulations threaten to become illegitimate representations. They would then shift the kind of interaction from representation to illegitimate forms of prediction or surveillance and thereby could lead to infringements to individual modes of freedom.’ Consequently, the implementation of digital twin technology in healthcare would seem to exclude the most vulnerable members of society from participation in and benefiting from medical innovation, …
Keywords digital twins   simulation   representation   social determinants of health   vulnerability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2021-107447
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Extension and Self-Connection.Ben Blumson & Manikaran Singh - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy.
Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists.Sent E.-M. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists.Esther-Mirjam Sent - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
Sent Simulating Simon Simulating Scientists.Esther-Mirjam Sente-Mail the Corresponding Author - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):479-500.
Abstract and Concrete Individuals and Projection.Jiri Raclavsky - 2017 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 24 (supplementary):74-88.
Individuals: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics.Shamik Dasgupta - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (1):35-67.
Digital Eternity.Henrique Jorge - 2019 - In Newton Lee (ed.), The Transhumanism Handbook. Springer Verlag. pp. 645-649.
Individualism at an Impasse.Samuel Black - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):347 - 377.
The Self-Moving Oil Droplet as a Homeostat.T. Ikegami - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):114-114.
Definably Connected Nonconnected Sets.Antongiulio Fornasiero - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):125-126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-08

Total views
7 ( #1,018,987 of 2,432,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #97,385 of 2,432,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes