University Sports Rivalries Provide Insights on Coalitional Psychology

Human Nature 29 (3):337-352 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sports are an excellent venue for demonstrating evolutionary principles to audiences not familiar with academic research. Team sports and sports fandom feature dynamics of in-group loyalty and intergroup competition, influenced by our evolved coalitional psychology. We predicted that reactions to expressions signaling mutual team/group allegiance would vary as a function of the territorial context. Reactions should become more prevalent, positive, and enthusiastic as one moves from the home territory to a contested area, and from a contested area to a rival’s territory during active rival engagement. We also predicted that men would be more responsive than women based on sex differences in evolved coalitional psychology. The research team visited public places immediately prior to 2016–2017 collegiate football and basketball games. A male research confederate wore a sweatshirt displaying the logo of one of the competing university teams and vocalized the team’s most popular slogan when he saw a fan displaying similar logos. Observers followed 5 m behind, recording reactions and response positivity/enthusiasm. Reaction tone was most positive in the rival territory, least positive in the home territory, and intermediate in the periphery and contested territory. Rates of “no reaction” were lowest in the rival territory but were highest in the periphery. Men had higher reaction rates and more positive and enthusiastic reaction tones than women. Reactions generally followed predictions based on expected signal value. This project provides evidence that coalitional psychology influences dynamics related to university sports team rivalries and that context matters for expressions of alliance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-evaluation maintenance in sports team rivalries.Robert A. Reeves & Abraham Tesser - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (4):329-331.
Beyond the Fishnets: Female Empowerment through Roller Derby.Ula Klein - 2016 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9 (2):198-207.
The Reality of Fantasy Sports: A Metaphysical and Ethical Analysis.Chad Carlson - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):187 - 204.
Officiating in Aesthetic Sports.Graham McFee - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):1-17.
The Ideal Fan or Good Fans?J. S. Russell - 2012 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):16-30.
Watching sport: aesthetics, ethics and emotion.Stephen Mumford - 2012 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-12

Downloads
19 (#682,951)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel J. Kruger
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Darwinism and Human Affairs.Michael Ruse - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (4):627-628.
Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. S. 87-99 in L. Betzig.N. Chagnon - forthcoming - Human Nature. A Critical Reader. Newyork/Oxford: Oxford University Press (Zuerst in Science 239: 985-92 (1988)).
Animal Nature and Human Nature.W. H. Thorpe - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (194):485-487.

View all 8 references / Add more references