Law and Philosophy 5 (2):237 - 262 (1986)
This essay argues that to understand much that is most central to and characteristic of the nature and behaviour of law, one needs to supplement the time-free conceptual staples of modern jurosprudence with an understanding of the nature and behaviour of traditions in social life. The article is concerned with three elements of such an understanding. First, it suggests that traditionality is to be found in almost all legal systems, not as a peripheral but as a central feature of them. Second, it questions the post-Enlightenment antinomy between tradition and change. Third, it argues that in at least two important senses of tradition, the traditionality of law is inescapable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’.Philip Schofield - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
Between Example and Doctrine Contract Law and Common Morality.M. Cathleen Kaveny - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):669-695.
The Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems: A Tibetan Study of Asian Religious Thought. Blo-Bzaṅ-Chos-Kyi-Ñi-Ma - 2009 - Wisdom Publicatiaons.
Metaphysics and Modernity: Natural Law and Natural Rights in Gershom Carmichael and Francis Hutcheson.Samuel Gregg - 2009 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):87-102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #163,783 of 2,158,385 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,385 )
How can I increase my downloads?