Roczniki Filozoficzne 52 (2):267-273 (2004)

Abstract
The paper aims at reconstructing Karl R. Popper\'s critical standpoint with regard to essentialism, as antiessentialism is the main presupposition of his antidefinitionism. Popper criticised essentialism for claiming that it is justified to apply the concept of things\' essential properties within the procedure of scientific explanation. He argued that the essentialists\' \"faith in essence\" is not scientific because of the lack of a criterion which would allow us to tell whether a certain definition grasps the essential properties of a given object. He doubted also that it is justified to apply the concept of intellectual intuition to the procedure of scientific explanation. Popper claimed that falsificationism gives a better concept of explanation, than that motivated by essentialism. He was convinced that falsificationism is logically more correct and more appropriately describes the real practice of scientists
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0035-7685
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lakatos' Modification of Popper's Falsificationism.Mo Liu - 2005 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh
In Defense of Essentialism.L. Paul - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):333–372.
Falsificationism Revisited.Mehmet Elgin - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:101-106.
The Philosophical Limits of Scientific Essentialism.George Bealer - 1987 - Philosophical Perspectives 1:289-365.
Essences and Natural Kinds.Alexander Bird - 2009 - In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge. pp. 497--506.
The Essence of Dispositional Essentialism.David Yates - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):93-128.
Confuting Popper on the Rationality Principle.Robert Nadeau - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):446-467.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-27

Total views
7 ( #966,454 of 2,333,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #587,885 of 2,333,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes