A proof of the partial anomalousness of the mental

Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):491-504 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Ontologically, brains are more basic than mental representations. Epistemologically, mental representations are more basic than brains and, indeed, all other non-mental entities: it is, and must be, on the basis of mental representations that we know anything about non-mental entities. Since, consequently, mental representations are epistemically more fundamental than brains, the former cannot possibly be explained in terms of the latter, notwithstanding that the latter are ontologically more fundamental than the former. There is thus an explanatory gap, notwithstanding the presumptive truth of materialism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,491

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The existence of mental objects.Frank Jackson - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (1):33-40.
The anomalousness of the mental.William E. Seager - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):389-401.
Mental activity.J. N. Wright - 1944 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 44:107-126.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Metaphysics and mental causation.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1993 - In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-96.
Why pains are mental objects.Harold Langsam - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):303-13.
Galen Strawson on mental reality.Tim Crane - 1997 - Ratio 10 (1):82-90.


Added to PP

67 (#216,889)

6 months
1 (#1,009,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John-Michael Kuczynski
University of California at Santa Barbara (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references