Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):221-234 (2006)
A series of representations must be semantics-driven if the members of that series are to combine into a single thought: where semantics is not operative, there is at most a series of disjoint representations that add up to nothing true or false, and therefore do not constitute a thought at all. A consequence is that there is necessarily a gulf between simulating thought, on the one hand, and actually thinking, on the other. A related point is that a popular doctrine - the so-called 'computational theory of mind' (CTM) - is based on a confusion. CTM is the view that thought-processes consist in 'computations', where a computation is defined as a 'form-driven' operation on symbols. The expression 'form-driven operation' is ambiguous, as it may refer either to syntax-driven operations or to morphology-driven operations. Syntax-driven operations presuppose the existence of operations that are driven by semantic and extra-semantic knowledge. So CTM is false if the terms 'computation' and 'form-driven operation' are taken to refer to syntax-driven operations. Thus, if CTM is to work, those expressions must be taken to refer to morphology-driven operations. CTM therefore fails, given that an operation must be semantics-driven if it is to qualify as a thought. CTM therefore fails on each possible disambiguation of the expressions 'formal operation' and 'computation,' and it is therefore false.
|Keywords||Computational Theory Formal Metaphysics Mind Operation Semantics Syntax Thought|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1987 - MIT Press.
Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science.Jerry A. Fodor - 1981 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evaluating the Historiography of the Great Depression: Explanation or Single‐Theory Driven?Rick Szostak - 2005 - Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):35-61.
Understanding Understanding: Syntactic Semantics and Computational Cognition.William J. Rapaport - 1995 - Philosophical Perspectives 9:49-88.
On the Type/Token Relation of Mental Representations.Murat Aydede - 2000 - Facta Philosophica 2 (1):23-50.
Conceptual Dependency as the Language of Thought.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 1990 - Synthese 82 (2):275-96.
Contributions to Syntax, Semantics, and the Philosophy of Science.Rolf Schock - 1964 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 5 (4):241--289.
Two Concepts of "Form" and the so-Called Computational Theory of Mind.John-Michael M. Kuczynski - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (6):795-821.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads224 ( #16,726 of 2,169,095 )
Recent downloads (6 months)25 ( #13,481 of 2,169,095 )
How can I increase my downloads?