Kendall Hunt Pub. Co (2009)
Philosophy is the science of the science; it is the analysis of the assumptions underlying empirical inquiry. Given that these assumptions cannot possibly be examined or even identified on the basis of empirical data, it follows that philosophy is a non-empirical discipline. And given that our linguistic and cultural practices cannot possibly be examined or even identified except on the basis of empirical data, it follows that philosophical questions are not linguistic questions and do not otherwise concern our conventions or our cultural practices. This entails that philosophical truths are not tautologous or otherwise trivial. It also entails that empiricism is false and, therefore, that Platonism is correct. Given a clear understanding of why Platonism is correct and of what this implies, a number of shibboleths of contemporary analytic philosophy are speedily demolished and are no less speedily replaced with independently corroborated and intuitively plausible alternatives. New answers are given to age-old questions concerning scientific explanation, causal and logical dependence, linguistic meaning, personal identity, the structure of the psyche, and the nature of personal responsibility. Existing answers to these question are thoroughly considered and duly extended, modified, or replaced. Every technical term is defined; every philosophy-specific concept is explained; and the positions defended are consistent with commonsense, so far as their being consistent with the relevant data allows them to be. Therefore, this book is intelligible to philosophically minded laymen. At the same time, it is appropriate for advanced scholars, given that it defends original viewpoints and given also that, even though it discusses old viewpoints, it does so in new ways. Because it is clearly written, it is intelligible to neophytes; but it is not an introductory text and it is not a textbook. There are two appendices: the first, a thorough exposition of the rudiments of formal logic, along with the conceptual underpinnings of that discipline; the second, a definition and analytic discussion of each technical term that occurs in the text. Most of the chapters are followed by study-questions and by practice tests.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Undefinability of Analytic Philosophy.Daniel Andler - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:267-285.
Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics.Evert Leeuwen Martine de Vrievans - forthcoming - Bioethics.
Reflective Equilibrium and Empirical Data: Third Person Moral Experiences in Empirical Medical Ethics.Martine de Vries & Evert van Leeuwen - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (9):490 - 498.
A Sketch of the History and Methodology of Ontology in the Analytic Tradition.John Symons - manuscript
Review of Ingmar Persson, The Retreat of Reason: A Dilemma in the Philosophy of Life. [REVIEW]Bart Streumer - 2007 - Times Literary Supplement (9 November).
The Analytic and the Synthetic. The Duhemian Argument and Some Contemporary Philosophers.George Krzywicki Herburt - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (2):104-113.
G. E. Moore and the Greifswald Objectivists on the Given and the Beginning of Analytic Philosophy.Nikolay Milkov - 2004 - Axiomathes 14 (4):361-379.
Continental Philosophy of Science.Babette Babich - 2007 - In Constantin Boundas (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to the Twentieth Century Philosophies. Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh Press. pp. 545--558.
Conceptions of Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy.M. Beaney - 2001 - Acta Analytica 25:97-116.
Added to index2012-04-04
Total downloads284 ( #10,128 of 2,143,899 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,706 of 2,143,899 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.