Authors
Mark Coeckelbergh
University of Vienna
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to show how the production of meaning is a matter of people interacting with technologies, throughout their appropriation and in co-performances. The researchers rely on the case of household-based voice assistants that endorse speaking as a primary mode of interaction with technologies. By analyzing the ethical significance of voice assistants as co-producers of moral meaning intervening in the material and socio-cultural space of the home, the paper invites their informed and critical use as a form of empowerment while acknowledging their productive role in human values. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents an empirically informed philosophical analysis. Using the conceptual frameworks of technological appropriation and human–technological performances, while drawing on the interviews with voice assistants’ users and literature studies, this paper unravels the meaning-making processes in relation to these technologies in the household use. It additionally draws on a Wittgensteinian perspective to attend to the productive role of language and link to wider cultural meanings. Findings By combining two approaches, appropriation and technoperformances, and analyzing the themes of privacy, power and knowledge, the paper shows how voice assistants help to shape a specific moral subject: embodied in space and made as it performatively responds to the device and makes sense of it together with others. Originality/value The researchers show how through making sense of technologies in appropriation and performatively responding to them, people can change and intervene in the power structures that technologies suggest.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1108/jices-06-2020-0072
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Alexa Does Not Care. Should You?Olga Kudina - 2019 - Glimpse 20:107-115.
A Woman'S Voice As Her Life Changes.Lisa Herzig - 2012 - World Futures 68 (7):518-534.
A Question of Voice: The Search for Legitimacy.Ronald Michael Scapp - 1990 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Does Initial Appropriation Create New Obligations?Jesse Spafford - 2020 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 17 (2).
Voice as Form of Life and Life Form.Sandra Laugier - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4:63-82.
How Human Communication Influences Virtual Personal Assistants.Daria Bylieva, Victoria Lobatyuk, Dmitry Kuznetsov & Natalia Anosova - 2021 - In Knowledge in the Information Society Joint Conferences XII Communicative Strategies of the Information Society and XX Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future. Cham: pp. 98-111.
An Introduction to Ethical Theory for Healthcare Assistants.Daniel Rodger & Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2017 - British Journal of Healthcare Assistants 11 (11):556-561.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-09

Total views
5 ( #1,151,701 of 2,432,763 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,245 of 2,432,763 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes