Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014)
AbstractMagicians use misdirection to prevent you from realizing the methods used to create a magical effect, thereby allowing you to experience an apparently impossible event. Magicians have acquired much knowledge about misdirection, and have suggested several taxonomies of misdirection. These describe many of the fundamental principles in misdirection, focusing on how misdirection is achieved by magicians. In this article we review the strengths and weaknesses of past taxonomies, and argue that a more natural way of making sense of misdirection is to focus on the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms involved. Our psychologically-based taxonomy has three basic categories, corresponding to the types of psychological mechanisms affected: perception, memory, and reasoning. Each of these categories is then divided into subcategories based on the mechanisms that control these effects. This new taxonomy can help organize magicians' knowledge of misdirection in a meaningful way, and facilitate the dialog between magicians and scientists.
Similar books and articles
The Gap Between Inattentional Blindness and Attentional Misdirection.Daniel Memmert - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1097-1101.
Misdirected by the Gap: The Relationship Between Inattentional Blindness and Attentional Misdirection.Gustav Kuhn & Benjamin W. Tatler - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):432-436.
Mind the Gap: Misdirection, Inattentional Blindness and the Relationship Between Overt and Covert Attention.Aidan Moran & Nuala Brady - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1105-1106.
What’s “Inattentional” About Inattentional Blindness?Steven B. Most - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1102-1104.
Rubens, Corsets and Taxonomies: A Response to Meek Lange, Rogers and Dodds.Florencia Luna - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (6):448-450.
Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.
Developing a Post-Prior Taxonomy of Ethical Sentences.Patrick Clipsham - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (3):801-820.
Popper and the 7th Approximation: The Problem of Taxonomy.Bennison Gray - 1980 - Dialectica 34 (2):129-154.
The Misdirection of Education Policy: Raising Questions About School Reform.Nancy Dafoe - 2016 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Analogy Counterarguments: A Taxonomy for Critical Thinking. [REVIEW]Cameron Shelley - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):223-238.
A Phenomenologically and Psychologically Based Concert of Ethics.M. Bayerova - 1990 - Filosoficky Casopis 38 (3):302-325.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Nature of Unsymbolized Thinking.Agustín Vicente & Fernando Martínez-Manrique - 2016 - Philosophical Explorations 19 (2):173-187.
Don’T Be Fooled! Attentional Responses to Social Cues in a Face-to-Face and Video Magic Trick Reveals Greater Top-Down Control for Overt Than Covert Attention.Gustav Kuhn, Robert Teszka, Natalia Tenaw & Alan Kingstone - 2016 - Cognition 146 (C):136-142.
The Vanishing Ball Illusion: A New Perspective on the Perception of Dynamic Events.Gustav Kuhn & Ronald A. Rensink - 2016 - Cognition 148 (C):64-70.
The Possibility of a Science of Magic.Ronald A. Rensink & Gustav Kuhn - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Socially Communicative Eye Contact and Gender Affect Memory.Sophie N. Lanthier, Michelle Jarick, Mona J. H. Zhu, Crystal S. J. Byun & Alan Kingstone - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
References found in this work
Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-Detection Ability.Daniel T. Levin, Nausheen Momen, Sarah B. Drivdahl & Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7 (1):397-412.
Towards a Science of Magic.Gustav Kuhn, Alym A. Amlani & Ronald A. Rensink - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (9):349-354.
A Function-Centered Taxonomy of Visual Attention.Ronald A. Rensink - 2015 - In Paul Coates & Sam Coleman (eds.), Phenomenal Qualities: Sense, Perception, and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 347-375.