Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):17-33 (2001)

Abstract
It is widely believed that reproductive human cloning is morally wrong and should be prohibited because it infringes on human uniqueness, individuality, freedom and personal identity. The philosophical and ethical discussion has, however, shown that it is far more difficult than might initially be supposed to sustain arguments against cloning on these and related grounds. More recently, a potentially viable argument, initially put forward by Hans Jonas, has regained new prominence. The argument holds that cloning is wrong because it denies the clone an `open future', that is, the ability to freely shape her own personal identity, life plans, self-chosen goals, etc. After a critical exposition of the argument, I argue as follows: If one understands the Open Future Argument as an argument about the welfare of the cloned child, then it cannot show that cloning harms the child in a person-affecting sense of harming and benefiting. If, on the other hand, one understands the argument in a non-person-affecting sense, then some, but not all, reproductive cloning decisions can be shown to be wrong. The argument does not show, however, that cloning ought to be prohibited by law. While cloning, like other widely accepted reproductive decisions, will sometimes fail to minimize harm to `the child', such acts – to the extent that they do not constitute harm in a person-affecting sense – ought to be tolerated by proponents of the Open Future Argument. Attempts to prohibit reproductive choices on the basis that they are not optimal, will undermine the same set of values that the Open Future Argument seeks to uphold
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/PL00000002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,044
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Feinberg, Mills, and the Child's Right to an Open Future.Mianna Lotz - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (4):537–551.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What's So Bad About Human Cloning?Yitzchok Breitowitz - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):325-341.
New Technologies, Old Distinctions.Max J. Latona - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:277-288.
The Identity of Clones.Kathinka Evers - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):67 – 76.
Does the Non-Identity Problem Block a Class of Arguments Against Cloning?Richard Greene - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (1):95-101.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
61 ( #169,339 of 2,433,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,411 of 2,433,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes