Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):83-83 (2011)

It warrants examining how well people can come to argue under supportive conditions, not only what they do under ordinary conditions. Sustained engagement of young people in dialogic argumentation yields more than the temporary that Mercier & Sperber (M&S) identify in the target article. If such engagement were to become the norm, who can say what the argumentive potential of future generations is?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x10002864
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Means and Ends, Nonviolence and Politics.Barry L. Gan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:177-184.
The Time Machine in Our Mind.Kurt Stocker - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (3):385-420.
Equality Versus Priority: A Misleading Distinction.Daniel M. Hausman - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238.
Varieties of Self-Deception.Robert F. Bornstein - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):108-109.
Dynamicists Versus Computationalists: Whither Mechanists?William Bechtel - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):629-629.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #651,223 of 2,462,206 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,178 of 2,462,206 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes