Synthese 184 (1):63-71 (2012)

Authors
Abstract
It is argued that the conjunction effect has a disjunctive analog of strong interest for the realism–antirealism debate. It is possible that a proper theory is more confirmed than its (more probable) observational sub-theory and hence than the latter’s disjunctive equivalent, i.e., the disjunction of all proper theories that are empirically equivalent to the given one. This is illustrated by a toy model
Keywords Linda-effect  Conjunction-effect  Disjunction-effect  Confirmation  Realism-antirealism debate
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-009-9697-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Testing for Convergent Realism.Jerrold L. Aronson - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):255-259.
The Whole Truth About Linda: Probability, Verisimilitude and a Paradox of Conjunction.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2010 - In Marcello D'Agostino, Federico Laudisa, Giulio Giorello, Telmo Pievani & Corrado Sinigaglia (eds.), New Essays in Logic and Philosophy of Science. College Publications. pp. 603--615.
Evolution of Human Jealousy a Just-so Story or a Just-so Criticism?Neven Sesardic - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):427-443.
The Search Hypothesis of Emotions.D. Evans - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):497-509.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-09

Total views
159 ( #56,789 of 2,348,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #63,395 of 2,348,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes