Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann, Margaret Little, Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth M. Armstrong & Lisa Harris
Bioethics 23 (1):1-8 (2009)
Over the last several years, as cesarean deliveries have grown increasingly common, there has been a great deal of public and professional interest in the phenomenon of women 'choosing' to deliver by cesarean section in the absence of any specific medical indication. The issue has sparked intense conversation, as it raises questions about the nature of autonomy in birth. Whereas mainstream bioethical discourse is used to associating autonomy with having a large array of choices, this conception of autonomy does not seem adequate to capture concerns and intuitions that have a strong grip outside this discourse. An empirical and conceptual exploration of how delivery decisions ought to be negotiated must be guided by a rich understanding of women's agency and its placement within a complicated set of cultural meanings and pressures surrounding birth. It is too early to be 'for' or 'against' women's access to cesarean delivery in the absence of traditional medical indications – and indeed, a simple pro- or con- position is never going to do justice to the subtlety of the issue. The right question is not whether women ought to be allowed to choose their delivery approach but, rather, taking the value of women's autonomy in decision-making around birth as a given, what sorts of guidelines, practices, and social conditions will best promote and protect women's full inclusion in a safe and positive birth process.
|Keywords||birth cesarean section cesarean delivery on maternal request CDMR vaginal delivery autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Moral Implications of Obstetric Technologies for Pregnancy and Motherhood.Susanne Brauer - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):45-54.
Autonomy in Place of Birth: A Concept Analysis.Berglind Halfdansdottir, Margaret E. Wilson, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Olof A. Olafsdottir, Alexander Kr Smarason & Herdis Sveinsdottir - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):591-600.
Similar books and articles
Gendered Politeness, Self-Respect, and Autonomy.Sylvia Burrow - 2008 - In Bernard Mulo Farenkia (ed.), In De la Politesse Linguistique au Cameroun / Linguistic Politeness in Cameroon. Peter Lang.
Home Birth: Consumer Choice and Restriction of Physician Autonomy. [REVIEW]Paul Thompson - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):481 - 487.
Women's Autonomy and Feminist Aspirations.Marilyn Friedman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:331-340.
Home Birth: Consumer Choice and Restriction of Physician Autonomy.Not By Me - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6).
Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Technology.Sylvia Burrow - 2012 - Techne 16 (1):31-45.
On The Cutting Edge: Ethical Responsiveness to Cesarean Section Rates.Sylvia Burrow - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):44-52.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #183,852 of 2,172,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?