AI and Society 36 (1):305-318 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Sequential transformative design of research :224–235, 2015; Groleau et al. in J Mental Health 16:731–741, 2007; Robson and McCartan in Real world research: a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings, Wiley, Chichester, 2016) allows testing a group of theoretical assumptions about the connections of artificial intelligence with culture and education. In the course of research, semiotics ensures the description of self-organizing systems of cultural signs and symbols in terms of artificial intelligence as a special set of algorithms. This approach helps to consider the arguments proposed by Searle :417–457, 1980) against ‘strong’ artificial intelligence. Searle :417–457, 1980) believes that artificial or machine intelligence cannot fully emulate the processes of the human mind. Machine intelligence shows own inevitable weakness. This is non-autonomous tool for computations and data operating. In fact, this tool cannot provide insight into real cognitive conditions. After Lotman and Uspensky, authors expand the meaning of artificial intelligence. The authors identify a cultural type of ‘strong’ artificial intelligence or ‘self-increase of Logos’ in terms by Lotman and Uspensky. The interpretation of human intelligence as imitation of machine intelligence makes possible such immersion of artificial intelligence in culture. The authors reveal a case of self-organizing autonomous generation, encoding, decoding, reception, storage, and transmission of social information in the field of physical training. From the empirical studies it is clear that the organization of collective activities without external control ensures the development of positive emotions and social orientations. Interest in autonomous behavior provides the formation of educational and cognitive motives. As a special set of algorithms, these motives are the most promising and favorable for personal development.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s00146-020-01026-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Toward an Ethics of AI Assistants: An Initial Framework.John Danaher - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (4):629-653.
View all 20 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Intelligence, Artificial and Otherwise.Paul Dumouchel - 2019 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 24 (2):241-258.
Re-Creating the Philosopher’s Mind: Artificial Life From Artificial Intelligence.Maurice H. T. Ling - 2012 - Human-Level Intelligence 2:1.
Embodied Artificial Intelligence Once Again.Anna Sarosiek - 2017 - Philosophical Problems in Science 63:231-240.
15 Challenges for AI: Or What AI (Currently) Can’T Do.Thilo Hagendorff & Katharina Wezel - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (2):355-365.
Consciousness, Intentionality, and Intelligence: Some Foundational Issues for Artificial Intelligence.Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere - 2000 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
"Every Man in His Notions" or Alchemists' Discussion on Artificial Intelligence.Mariusz Flasiński - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (1):107-121.
Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein.Gerard Casey - 1988 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 32:156-175.
Big Data E Intelligenza Artificiale: Che Futuro Ci Aspetta?Giuseppe Longo - 2018 - Scienza E Filosofia 20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-07-31
Total views
12 ( #805,716 of 2,498,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,401 )
2020-07-31
Total views
12 ( #805,716 of 2,498,401 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,401 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads