Main problems of diagrammatic reasoning. Part I: The generalization problem [Book Review]

Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):75-96 (2009)
The paper attempts to analyze in some detail the main problems encountered in reasoning using diagrams, which may cause errors in reasoning, produce doubts concerning the reliability of diagrams, and impressions that diagrammatic reasoning lacks the rigour necessary for mathematical reasoning. The paper first argues that such impressions come from long neglect which led to a lack of well-developed, properly tested and reliable reasoning methods, as contrasted with the amount of work generations of mathematicians expended on refining the methods of reasoning with formulae and predicate calculus. Next, two main groups of problems occurring in diagrammatic reasoning are introduced. The second group, called diagram imprecision, is then briefly summarized, its detailed analysis being postponed to another paper. The first group, called collectively the generalization problem, is analyzed in detail in the rest of the paper. The nature and causes of the problems from this group are explained, methods of detecting the potentially harmful occurrences of these problems are discussed, and remedies for possible errors they may cause are proposed. Some of the methods are adapted from similar methods used in reasoning with formulae, several other problems constitute new, specifically diagrammatic ways of reliable reasoning.
Keywords Diagrammatics  Diagrammatic reasoning  Rigorous reasoning  Reasoning errors  Generalization  Diagram particularity  Divergence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-008-9148-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Logical Status of Diagrams.Sun-Joo Shin & Giovanna Corsi - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):290-291.
Visual Thinking.Rudolf Arnheim - 1969 - London: Faber.
Can Pictures Prove?Ian Dove - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mathematical Wit and Mathematical Cognition.Andrew Aberdein - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):231-250.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On Automating Diagrammatic Proofs of Arithmetic Arguments.Mateja Jamnik, Alan Bundy & Ian Green - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (3):297-321.
Case Method and Casuistry: The Problem of Bias.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).
Diagrams as Sketches.Brice Halimi - 2012 - Synthese 186 (1):387-409.
A Diagrammatic Calculus of Syllogisms.Ruggero Pagnan - 2012 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (3):347-364.
The Tinctures and Implicit Quantification Over Worlds.Jay Zeman - 1997 - In Paul Forster & Jacqueline Brunning (eds.), The Rule of Reason: The Philosophy of C.S. Peirce. University of Toronto Press. pp. 96-119.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
52 ( #104,383 of 2,202,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #35,364 of 2,202,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature