Newton, Spinoza, Stoics and Others
The Leibniz Review 18:81-121 (2008)
Abstract
Starting from Leibniz’s complaint that Newton’s views seem to make God the soul of the world, this paper examines Leibniz’s critical stance more generally towards God as the soul of the world and related theses. A preliminary task is determining what the related theses are. There are more of these than might have been thought. Once the relations are established, it becomes clear how pervasive the various guises of the issue of God as the soul of the world are in Leibniz’s thought and how central they are in his debates with contemporaries about the truths of natural religion and even more strictly philosophical issues. Leibniz’s arguments against God as the soul of the world are reconstructed and evaluated, and the difficult question of the exact meaning, or meanings, that Leibniz ascribes to the thesis that God is the soul of the world is taken up. The clearest core of meaning discussed in this paper is most directly relevant to Leibniz’s criticisms of Spinoza and the Stoics, as well as of Descartes. Less clear, but obviously important, are meanings relevant to Leibniz’s debates with the occasionalists and NewtoniansISBN(s)
1524-1556
DOI
10.5840/leibniz2008183
My notes
Similar books and articles
Existence, Essence, et Expression: Leibniz sur 'toutes les absurdités du Dieu de Spinoza'.Brandon C. Look - forthcoming - In Pierre-Francois Moreau & Mogens Laerke (eds.), Spinoza et Leibniz.
Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Leibniz, creation and the best of all possible worlds.Jesse R. Steinberg - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):123 - 133.
Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God.Mogens Laerke - 2011 - Archiv Fuer Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (1):58 - 84.
Leibniz on Substance and God in “That a Most Perfect Being Is Possible”.Nicholas Okrent - 2000 - Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):79-93.
Leibniz on Cartesian Omnipotence and Contingency.David Werther - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (1):23 - 36.
Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence.David Werther - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (1):37 - 48.
Leibniz on Knowledge and God.Christia Mercer - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):531-550.
Why Shouldn’t Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Miracles in the Best of all Possible Worlds: Leibniz's Dilemma and Leibniz's Razor.Gregory Brown - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1):19-39.
Leibniz on Emotions and the Human Body.Markku Roinila - 2011 - In Breger Herbert, Herbst Jürgen & Erdner Sven (eds.), Natur und Subjekt (IX. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress Vorträge). Leibniz Geschellschaft.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-03-18
Downloads
68 (#178,475)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2012-03-18
Downloads
68 (#178,475)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads