Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review [Book Review]

Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346 (2014)
Abstract
With the ever expanding array of professional journals, pressures on the peer review process have increased considerably. Unless editors and publishers recognize the need for improving the efficiency of the process, the future of traditional peer review may be at risk. This is a review of the studies that have followed up the suggestions made by Ingelfinger in 1974 for improvement of manuscript peer review. Implementation of changes has been slow, despite the abundance of literature that suggests the necessary improvements. Conscientious self-regulation is expected of editors who, in the current publication scenario, possess enormous power without liability. Suitability of peer review to outsourcing should be assessed and if it is absolutely essential to outsource peer review, care should be taken to ensure that it is implemented systematically and monitored regularly for quality. Finally, it is time for high earning publishers to consider compensation for the efforts of the reviewers
Keywords Peer review  Tardy peer review  Editorial policy on peer review  Publication delay  Ethics of peer review
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10805-014-9220-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,457
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Heuristic Decision Making.Gerd Gigerenzer & Wolfgang Gaissmaier - 2011 - Annual Review of Psychology 62:451-482.
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Peer Review in Bioethics.D. Wendler & F. Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):697-701.
The Principles and Practices of Peer Review.Ronald N. Kostoff - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):19-34.
'Peer Review' Culture.Dr Malcolm Atkinson - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):193-204.
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.
Advances in Peer Review Research: An Introduction.Arthur E. Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):3-10.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-22

Total downloads
16 ( #367,020 of 2,285,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #96,600 of 2,285,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature