NanoEthics 12 (2):155-172 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Synthetic biology is an emerging technology that asks for inclusive reflection on how people frame the field. To unravel how we can facilitate such reflection, this study evaluates the Frame Reflection Lab. Building upon playfulness design principles, the FRL comprises a workshop with video-narratives and co-creative group exercises. We studied how the FRL facilitated frame reflection by organizing workshops with various student groups. Analysis of 12 group conversations and 158 mini-exit surveys yielded patterns in first-order reflection as well as patterns in second-order reflection. Also patterns in participants’ framing of synthetic biology could be induced; participants’ viewpoints converged to some extent, yet with openness to individual viewpoint differences. Although the FRL method fortified the reflection processes of participants, the narratives and the workshop’s flexible format could inhibit the reflection too. Therefore, we advise designers of future frame reflection methods to apply stronger conversational facilitation and narratives of slightly mysterious yet identifiable narrators, in case e.g. video-narratives are created and used to scaffold the reflection process. Nevertheless, we argue that the use of a playful frame reflection method like the FRL could function well as a step to precede more application-specific deliberation or decision-making on synthetic biology and as a method for the collection of contemporary citizen viewpoints plus rationales underlying these, for the further responsible development of the emerging field.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11569-018-0318-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frame Reflection Lab: A Playful Method for Frame Reflection on Synthetic Biology.Marjoleine G. van der Meij, Anouk A. L. M. Heltzel, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse & Frank Kupper - 2018 - NanoEthics 12 (2):155-172.
More on Full Reflection Below $${\Aleph_\Omega}$$.James Cummings & Dorshka Wylie - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (6):659-671.
Reflection on Reflection in Action: A Case Study of Growers Conception of Irrigation Strategies in Pot Plant Production. [REVIEW]Beatrix W. Alsanius, Klara Löfkvist, Göran Kritz & Adrian Ratkic - 2009 - AI and Society 23 (4):545-558.
Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?Colin Marshall - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576.
Semistationary and Stationary Reflection.Hiroshi Sakai - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1):181-192.
Locke's Theory of Reflection.Kevin Scharp - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):25 – 63.
Facilitating Reflection Among Family Literacy Participants.Donald J. Yarosz & Susan Willar Fountain - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 23 (1-2):39-43.
Some Observation upon Existence Three Different Perspectives.En-lai Li & Ye-wei Sun - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 6:32-37.
A Non-Factualist Defense of the Reflection Principle.Stephanie Beardman - 2013 - Synthese 190 (15):2981-2999.
Does Reflection Lead to Wise Choices?Lisa Bortolotti - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):297-313.
Critical Reflection, Self-Knowledge, and the Emotions.Catriona Mackenzie - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (3):186-206.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-01-25
Total views
20 ( #514,307 of 2,411,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,611 of 2,411,684 )
2019-01-25
Total views
20 ( #514,307 of 2,411,684 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,611 of 2,411,684 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads