Business Ethics Quarterly 3 (1):17-25 (1993)
This paper clarifies the nature of genetic screening and morally evaluates using it to deny people employment. Four sets of variables determine screening’s ability to forecast disorder. The first two concern epistemological limitations: whether the gene itself has been located; whether knowledge of other family members is necessary. The latter two refer to genetic causality: whether other genes are needed; whether the gene causes the disorder or just a susceptibility to it.Considerations of privacy and justice warrant restricting screening to job-specific disorders, without prejudice to the worker. Screening is more of an invasion of privacy than most “searches” because our very selves are disclosed; serious stigmatizing can result. It is unjust to penalize someone for a susceptibility to a disorder. It is also unjust to use the genetic knowledge and technology, developed with public monies allocated for public good, against members of the public
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Business and Professional Ethics Social Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening.Robert H. Blank - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
The Social Construction of Genetic Abnormality: Ethical Implications for Managerial Decisions in the Workplace. [REVIEW]Alan Strudler - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (11):839 - 848.
Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives.Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
The New World of Human Genetic Technologies: The Policy Environment and Impacts of Genetic Screening Tests. [REVIEW]Jose Sanmart�N. - 1995 - AI and Society 9 (1):105-114.
Genetic Screening in the Workplace: Legislative and Ethical Implications. [REVIEW]William D. Murry, James C. Wimbush & Dan R. Dalton - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):365 - 378.
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective.Sahin Aksoy - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening.Diane B. Paul - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
Parliament and Screening: Ethical and Social Problems Arising From Testing and Screening for HIV and Genetic Disease.D. Miller - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):366-366.
Culture and Genetic Screening in Africa.Ayodele S. Jegede - 2009 - Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):128-137.
Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
From a Genetic Predisposition to an Interactive Predisposition: Rethinking the Ethical Implications of Screening for Gene-Environment Interactions.James Tabery - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (1):27-48.
Biological Monitoring and Genetic Screening in the Industrial Workplace: A Synopsis and Analysis.Robert I. Field - 1983 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 11 (3):125-129.
From What Should We Protect Future Generations: Germ-Line Therapy or Genetic Screening?Pierre Mallia & Henk ten Have - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (1):17-24.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #429,100 of 2,164,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?