Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (3):430-450 (2018)
AbstractThis article introduces a new formulation of the interest theory of rights. The focus is on ‘Bentham’s test’, which was devised by Matthew Kramer to limit the expansiveness of the interest theory. According to the test, a party holds a right correlative to a duty only if that party stands to undergo a development that is typically detrimental if the duty is breached. The article shows how the entire interest theory can be reformulated in terms of the test. The article then focuses on a further strength of the interest theory, brought to the fore by the new formulation. In any Western legal system, the tortious maltreatment of a child or a mentally disabled individual results in a compensatory duty. The interest theory can account for such duties in a simple and elegant way. The will theory, on the other hand, struggles to explain such compensatory duties unless it abandons some of its main tenets.
Similar books and articles
Authority and Interest in the Theory of Right.Nieswandt Katharina - 2019 - In David Plunkett, Scott Shapiro & Kevin Toh (eds.), Legal Norms, Moral Norms: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 315-334.
Raz on Rights: Human Rights, Fundamental Rights, and Balancing.Aleardo Zanghellini - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (1):25-40.
Rights bearers and rights functions.Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1625-1646.
Capacity, claims and children's rights.Mhairi Cowden - 2012 - Contemporary Political Theory 11 (4):362-380.
Theories of Rights: Is There a Third Way?Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):281-310.
In defense of the jurisdiction theory of rights.Eric Mack - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):71-98.
Hobbes's theory of rights – a modern interest theory.Eleanor Curran - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (1):63-86.
Infinite Regress and Hohfeld: A Comment on Hillel Steiner’s “Directed Duties and Inalienable Rights”.Pierfrancesco Biasetti - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):139-152.
The Compensatory Rights of Emerging Interest Groups.Edmund F. Byrne - 1993 - Social Philosophy Today 8:397-416.
Rights: Beyond interest theory and will theory? [REVIEW]Rowan Cruft - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (4):347 - 397.
The Missing Link in Stakeholder Theory: A Philosophical Framework.Anja Matwijkiw & Bronik Matwijkiw - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):125-154.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Correlativity and the Case Against a Common Presumption About the Structure of Rights.Michael Da Silva - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (2):289-307.
Meaningful and meaningless rights proclamations.Giulio Fornaroli - 2022 - Jurisprudence 13 (4):545-568.
References found in this work
Wrongs, Rights, and Third Parties.Nicolas Cornell - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (2):109-143.
A hybrid theory of claim-rights.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2):257-274.