Abstract
My purpose has been more negative than positive. That is, I have challenged the view that Sorai understoodtian as an intentional agent. At minimum, Sorai’s philosophical views do not depend upon such a conception oftian, and he refrains from characterizingtian in such terms when he discusses the concept oftian directly. However, I do not claim to have proven that Sorai’s view oftian was completely naturalistic, or even that Sorai did not—at some level—believe thattian had intentions. I have, I hope, shown thatthe case that Sorai viewedtian as intentional has not been convincingly made. Further, something closer to a dynamic and indeterminate naturalistic view is a reasonable alternative. On my reading, Sorai steers a course between the Song Confucian view oftian as static and knowable (a view that he explicitly rejects) and a view oftian as intentional (a view he never unequivocally expresses)—indeed, he rejects the idea of personifyingtian. When Sorai speaks of thexin or mind of tian, he is best understood as employing a metaphor that implies complexity, mystery, activity, and perhaps moral structure, but not intentionality in the normal sense. The complexity, indeterminacy, and dynamism oftian, as these are expressed in Sorai’s writings, do not necessarily imply willful intent on the part oftian, for they are all consistent with the Xunzian interpretation oftian as a natural process, even iftian’s regularities have a moral character
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/BF02868038
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Tokugawa Political Writings.Tetsuo Najita (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Hsün Tzu as a Religious Philosopher.Edward J. Machle - 1976 - Philosophy East and West 26 (4):443-461.
Sorai and Xunzi on the Construction of the Way.Kurtis Hagen - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):117 – 141.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Distinguishing the Way =.Sorai Ogyū - 1970 - Tokyo, Sophia University.
Bendō ; Benmei I.Ogyū Sorai - 1998 - In Tetsuo Najita, Sorai Ogyū & Shundai Dazai (eds.), Tokugawa Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Independent Intentional Objects.Katalin Farkas - 2010 - In Tadeusz Czarnecki, Katarzyna Kijanija-Placek, Olga Poller & Jan Wolenski (eds.), The Analytical Way. College Publications.
On Trying to Save the Simple View.Thomas Nadelhoffer - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (5):565-586.
Sorai and Xunzi on the Construction of the Way.Kurtis Hagen - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):117 – 141.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
14 ( #657,555 of 2,349,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #239,083 of 2,349,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes