Philosophical Studies 166 (1):45-64 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A prominent argument for moral realism notes that we are inclined to accept realism in science because scientific inquiry supports a robust set of critical practices—error, improvement, explanation, and the like. It then argues that because morality displays a comparable set of critical practices, a claim to moral realism is just as warranted as a claim to scientific realism. But the argument is only as strong as its central analogy—and here there is trouble. If the analogy between the critical practices of science and morality is loosely interpreted, the argument does not support moral realism—for paradigmatically constructivist discourses like fashion display the relevant critical practices just as well. So if the argument is to have force, the realist must say more about why the critical practices of morality are sufficiently like those of science to warrant realism. But this cannot be done—moral inquiry differs from scientific inquiry in too many important ways. So the analogy with the critical practices of science fails to vindicate moral realism. But there are further lessons: in looking closely at the critical practices of our moral discourse—and in comparing them to the critical practices of science and fashion—we gain insight into what is distinctive about morality objectivity and moral metaphysics
|
Keywords | Moral realism Moral constructivism Critical practices Analogy argument Moral objectivity |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11098-012-0020-7 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.Sharon Street - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):109-166.
Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment.Shaun Nichols - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
View all 26 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Cornell Realism, Explanation, and Natural Properties.Luis R. G. Oliveira & Timothy Perrine - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):1021-1038.
Similar books and articles
Practical Critical Realism for Liberal Arts in Language Education.Joseph Poulshock - 2011 - Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):465-484.
Can Cornell Moral Realism Adequately Account for Moral Knowledge?Elizabeth Tropman - 2012 - Theoria 78 (1):26-46.
Quasi-Realism's Problem of Autonomous Effects.Sergio Tenenbaum - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):392–409.
God and Moral Realism.Katherin Rogers - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):103-118.
Moral and Epistemic Open-Question Arguments.Chris Heathwood - 2009 - Philosophical Books 50 (2):83-98.
Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies. [REVIEW]Donelson R. Forsyth - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):461 - 470.
The Explanationist Argument for Moral Realism.Neil Sinclair - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):1-24.
Could Morality Have a Source?Chris Heathwood - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (2):1-19.
Women's Human Rights and Changing State Practices: A Critical Realist Approach.Lynn Savery - 2005 - Journal of Critical Realism 4 (1):89-111.
The Problem of Obligation, the Finite Rational Will, and Kantian Value Realism.Anne Margaret Baxley - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (6):567-583.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-09-04
Total views
540 ( #11,380 of 2,411,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #33,562 of 2,411,639 )
2012-09-04
Total views
540 ( #11,380 of 2,411,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #33,562 of 2,411,639 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads