Environmental Ethics 3 (2):147-154 (1981)
While Eastern and Western cultures agree that life is sacred, and that morality demands its protection, they differ sharply as to how the term life is to be interpreted, and therefore what prohibitions against killing should entail. l examine some of these conflicting perspectives, explore life as an ambiguous term, and suggest are interpretation of the concept, which permits moral ruIes against killing to be applied more rationally
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Killing, Letting Die, and the Morality of Abortion.Anton Tupa - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):1-26.
The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life.Jeff McMahan - 2002 - Oup Usa.
Decisions About Life and Death: Assessing the Law Reform Commission and the Presidential Commission Reports. [REVIEW]Earl Winkler - 1985 - Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 6 (2):74-89.
The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life.N. Agar - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):445 – 447.
Self-Defence and the Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity.Helen Frowe - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):530-546.
End-of-Life Decisions and Moral Psychology: Killing, Letting Die, Intention and Foresight. [REVIEW]Charles Douglas - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):337-347.
Life-Prolonging Killings and Their Relevance to Ethics.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #347,264 of 2,153,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?