Ethics and International Affairs 35 (1):119-144 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
Arguments about the ownership of natural resources have focused on the claims of cosmopolitans, who urge an equality of global claims to resources, and resource sovereigntists, who argue that national peoples are the proper owners of their resources. This focus is mistaken: Whatever one believes about the in-principle claims of the global community, there remains the practical question of how the national surplus is to be distributed. And in addressing this question, we must look at a distinction heretofore ignored in resource discussions—that between resident workers and citizens. I argue that the extracted value of natural resources should benefit all residents of the states in which they are found, not merely all citizens. By contrast, control of natural resources should be vested in a democratic citizenry, who are nonetheless normatively constrained by the distributive principle described above. I illustrate the argument with data showing the gap, especially in the Gulf States, between principles that allocate benefits to all citizens vs. to all resident workers. My argument is grounded in a broader theory of collective agency as it applies to questions of distributive justice, and it is aimed not only to criticize practices in the Gulf but to support the more inclusive resource policies found in democracies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0892679421000095
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):455-458.
Blood Oil. A Précis.Leif Wenar - forthcoming - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche.
The Right to Private Property.Jeremy Waldron & Stephen A. Munzer - 1992 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (2):196-206.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Customary Trade and the Complications of Consent.Shmuel Nili - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (3):315-330.
Against ‘Permanent Sovereignty’ Over Natural Resources.Chris Armstrong - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):129-151.
Against ‘Permanent Sovereignty’ Over Natural Resources.Chris Armstrong - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):129-151.
Territorial Rights and Carbon Sinks.Steve Vanderheiden - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (5):1273-1287.
Clean Trade, Anti-Paternalism, and Resources’ Entitlement.Valentina Gentile - 2017 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 7 (1):79-94.
The Global Fund: A Reply to Casal.Hillel Steiner - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (3):328-334.
Justice and Natural Resources.Steven Luper-Foy - 1992 - Environmental Values 1 (1):47-64.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-08

Total views
5 ( #1,167,906 of 2,445,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,181 of 2,445,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes