Authors
Oskari Kuusela
University of East Anglia
Abstract
This article discusses the relation between the early Wittgenstein’s and Carnap’s philosophies of logic, arguing that Carnap’s position in The Logical Syntax of Language is in certain respects much closer to the Tractatus than has been recognized. In Carnapian terms, the Tractatus’ goal is to introduce, by means of quasi-syntactical sentences, syntactical principles and concepts to be used in philosophical clarification in the formal mode. A distinction between the material and formal mode is therefore already part of the Tractatus’ view, and its method for introducing syntactical concepts and principles should be entirely acceptable for Carnap by his own criteria. Moreover, despite the Tractatus’ rejection of syntactical statements, there is an important correspondence between Wittgenstein’s saying-showing distinction and Carnap’s object-language-syntax-language distinction: both constitute a distinction between logico-syntactical determinations concerning language and language as determined or described by those determinations. Wittgenstein’s distinction therefore constitutes a precursor of the object-language syntax-language distinction which the latter in a certain sense affirms, rather than simply contradicting it. The saying-showing distinction agrees with Carnap’s position also in marking logic as something that isn’t true/false about either language or reality, which is a conception that underlies Carnap’s principle of tolerance.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4148/jhap.v1i3.1334
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Character of Philosophic Problems.Rudolf Carnap - 1934 - Philosophy of Science 1 (1):5-19.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Tree and the Net: Reading the Tractatus Two-Dimensionally.Oskari Kuusela - 2015 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 70 (1):229-232.
Tractarian Sätze : Instructions for Use.Jan Wawrzyniak - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (3):1209-1234.
On Logic, Syntax, and Slience.Majid Davoody Beni - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 42 (1):195-209.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Carnap's Criterion of Logicality.Denis Bonnay - 2009 - In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Carnap's Conventionalism: The Problem with P-Rules.Thomas Oberdan - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):119-137.
Carnap's Theories of Confirmation.Pierre Wagner - 2011 - In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer. pp. 477--486.
Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour.Gregory Lavers - 2008 - Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
Wittgenstein and Realism.Hilary Putnam - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):3 – 16.
The Logical Syntax of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co..

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-09-20

Total views
403 ( #20,149 of 2,440,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,137 of 2,440,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes