Introductive probability and the paradox of ideal evidence

Philosophica 17 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-inductive explication of two inductive intuitions.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):209-223.
A brand new type of inductive logic: Reply to Diderik Batens.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):248-252.
Evidence.Victor DiFate - 2007 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Conditionalizing on knowledge.Timothy Williamson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):89-121.
Quantifier probability logic and the confirmation paradox.Theodore Hailperin - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):83-100.
The paradox of ideal evidence.R. H. Vincent - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (4):497-503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
50 (#311,977)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Coherence and the axioms of confirmation.Abner Shimony - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (1):1-28.
Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic.Imre Lakatos - 1968 - In The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 315--417.

Add more references