A Counter-Example to SSI and Contextualism

Abstract

In this paper, I present a counter-example to the two most prominent theories of pragmatic encroachment (regarding knowledge ascriptions): Contextualism (specifically, DeRose's version), and Stanley's Subject-Sensitive Invariantism (SSI). The example is a variation on DeRose's bank case. Key words: Knowledge, knowledge ascriptions, pragmatic encroachment, Stanley, DeRose, bank case, standards, stakes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-01

Downloads
342 (#70,592)

6 months
63 (#95,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Igal Kvart
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references