The confusion over foundationalism

Philosophia 16 (3-4):345-354 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Foundationalism came under attack in two areas in the first half of this century. First, some doubted whether the foundations were adequate to support the entire structure of knowledge, and second, the doctrine of the [email protected] came under serious attack. = However, many epistemologists were not convinced that foundationalism was to be abandoned even if the criticisms were granted. According to these epistemologist, far from having shown that foundationalism itself was at fault, the critics of foundationalism had only been attacking one particular version of foundationalism--that version that included infallibility, incorrigibility,, or some appeal to a [email protected] at the base of the structure of justification. The claim of these defenders was that there are other possible types of foundationalism than this version of foundationalism, which has come to be called Classical Foundationalism. And thus opened up a new area of philosophical lexicography: the attempt to say what foundationalism itself is, so that Classical Foundationalism turned out to be one instance of foundationalism but not the only possible one.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On a “Fatal Dilemma” for Moderate Foundationalism.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Christian Lee - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:251-259.
Memory foundationalism and the problem of unforgotten carelessness.Robert Schroer - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (1):74–85.
What’s Not Wrong with Foundationalism.Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):161–165.
An argument against foundationalism.John Kekes - 1983 - Philosophia 12 (3-4):273-281.
Foundationalism and Contemporary Theology.Thomas Guarino - 1989 - Philosophy and Theology 3 (3):241-252.


Added to PP

112 (#115,732)

6 months
1 (#480,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan L. Kvanvig
Washington University in St. Louis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid S. Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.
Protokollsätze.Otto Neurath - 1932 - Erkenntnis 3 (1):204-214.
Two types of foundationalism.William P. Alston - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (7):165-185.
Coherence, certainty, and epistemic priority.Roderick Firth - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):545-557.

Add more references