Abstract
In his impressive and wide?ranging new book, Sources of the Self, Charles Taylor argues that modern moral philosophy, at least within the Anglo?American tradition, . offers a ?cramped? view of morality. Taylor attributes this problem to three distinctive features of contemporary moral theory ? its commitment to procedural rather than substantive rationality, its preference for basic reasons rather than qualitative distinctions, and its belief in the priority of the right over the good. According to Taylor, the result of these features is that contemporary moral theories cannot explain the nature of a worthwhile life, or the grounds for moral respect. Indeed, they render these questions unintelligible. I argue that Taylor has misunderstood the basic structure of most modern moral theory, which seeks to relocate, rather than suppress, these important questions. In particular, he fails to note the difference between general and specific conceptions of the good, between procedures for assessing the good and specific outcomes of that procedure, and between society's enforcement of morality and an individual's voluntary compliance with morality. Each of these distinctions plays an important role in contemporary moral theory. Once they are made explicit, it is clear that many contemporary theorists operate with a more sophisticated account of moral sources than Taylor attributes to them
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201749108602250
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Morals by Agreement.David P. Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Reason.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1963 - Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.John Rawls - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (9):515-572.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

MacIntyre and The Ethics of Catastrophe.Sacha Golob - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29 (2):204-220.
Strong Evaluation and Weak Ontology. The Predicament of Charles Taylor.Michiel Meijer - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (5):440-459.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Living a Life and the Problem of Existential Impossibility.Martin Low‐Beer - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (2):217 – 236.
Must We Return to Moral Realism?Michael Rosen - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (2):183 – 194.
A Critique of Charles Taylor's Notions of “Moral Sources” and “Constitutive Goods”.Arto Laitinen - 2004 - In Jussi Kotkavirta & Michael Quante (eds.), Moral Realism. Acta Philosophica Fennica. pp. 73-104.
Morality and the Good Life.Thomas L. Carson & Paul K. Moser (eds.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-05

Total views
33 ( #345,440 of 2,505,624 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,624 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes