How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition

Cognitive Science 35 (7):1243-1281 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Some empirical evidence in the artificial language acquisition literature has been taken to suggest that statistical learning mechanisms are insufficient for extracting structural information from an artificial language. According to the more than one mechanism (MOM) hypothesis, at least two mechanisms are required in order to acquire language from speech: (a) a statistical mechanism for speech segmentation; and (b) an additional rule-following mechanism in order to induce grammatical regularities. In this article, we present a set of neural network studies demonstrating that a single statistical mechanism can mimic the apparent discovery of structural regularities, beyond the segmentation of speech. We argue that our results undermine one argument for the MOM hypothesis



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Statistical Learning Can Play Well with Universal Grammar.Lisa S. Pearl - 2021 - In Nicholas Allott, Terje Lohndal & Georges Rey (eds.), A Companion to Chomsky. Wiley. pp. 267–286.


Added to PP

144 (#133,094)

6 months
9 (#355,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paco Calvo Garzon
University of Murcia

References found in this work

Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky (ed.) - 1980 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Rules and representations.Noam A. Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (127):1-61.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):1-15.
Features of similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.

View all 19 references / Add more references