Legal Theory 20 (1):52-77 (2014)

Authors
Cecile Laborde
University College London
Abstract
Egalitarian theories of religious freedom deny that religion is entitled to special treatment in law above and beyond that granted to comparable beliefs and practices. The most detailed and influential defense of such an approach is Christopher Eisgruber and Lawrence Sager's Religious Freedom and the Constitution (2007). In this essay I develop, elucidate, and show the limits of the strategy adopted by Eisgruber and Sager. The strategy requires that religion be analogized with other beliefs and practices according to a robust metric of comparison. I argue that Eisgruber and Sager fail to develop a consistent and coherent metric and I further suggest that this failure is symptomatic of the broader difficulty encountered by liberal theory in fitting the concept of religious freedom into a broadly egalitarian framework
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1352325213000141
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism and Religion: On Separation and Establishment.Cécile Laborde - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (1):67-86.
Cultural Exemptions, Expensive Tastes, and Equal Opportunities.Jonathan Quong - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):53–71.
Bearing the Consequences of Belief.Peter Jones - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (1):24–43.
On Noncoercive Establishment.Daniel Brudney - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (6):812-839.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Freedom of Religion, Inc.: Whose Sovereignty? Cohen - 2015 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 44 (3):169-210.
Why Tolerate Conscience?François Boucher & Cécile Laborde - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):493-514.
Accommodating Religion and Shifting Burdens.Peter Jones - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):515-536.
Why Tolerate Conscience?François Boucher & Cécile Laborde - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-21.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Equality, Freedom, and Religion.Roger Trigg - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Marcuse and Freedom.Peter Lind - 1985 - St. Martin's Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
48 ( #233,933 of 2,498,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes