Disarmament revisited: A reply to Kavka and Hardin

Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):261-265 (1983)

Authors
Douglas Lackey
Baruch College (CUNY)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Transparently False: Reply to Hardin.D. K. Buckner - 1986 - Analysis 46 (March):86-87.
Reply to Levine.C. L. Hardin - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):41-50.
Reply to Teller.C. L. Hardin - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):61-64.
Reply to Wilson.C. L. Hardin - 1991 - Philosophical Psychology 4 (1):79-81.
Douglas P. Lackey -- The Moral Case for Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament.D. P. Lackey - 1984 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):157-171.
Unilateral Versus Mutual Disarmament.Russell Hardin - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):236-254.
Doubts About Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):255-260.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
11 ( #616,911 of 2,325,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #712,496 of 2,325,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature