Mad Mothers, Bad Mothers, and What a "Good" Mother Would Do: The Ethics of Ambivalence

New York: Columbia University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When a mother kills her child, we call her a bad mother, but, as this book shows, even mothers who intend to do their children harm are not easily categorized as "mad" or "bad." Maternal love is a complex emotion rich with contradictory impulses and desires, and motherhood is a conflicted state in which women constantly renegotiate the needs mother and child, the self and the other. Applying care ethics philosophy and the work of Emmanuel Levinas, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Simone de Beauvoir to real-world experiences of motherhood, Sarah LaChance Adams throws the inherent tensions of motherhood into sharp relief, drawing a more nuanced portrait of the mother and child relationship than previously conceived. The maternal example is particularly instructive for ethical theory, highlighting the dynamics of human interdependence while also affirming separate interests. LaChance Adams particularly focuses on maternal ambivalence and its morally productive role in reinforcing the divergence between oneself and others, helping to recognize the particularities of situation, and negotiating the difference between one's own needs and the desires of others. She ultimately argues maternal filicide is a social problem requiring a collective solution that ethical philosophy and philosophies of care can inform.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Putting infants in their place.David Spurrett & Andrew Dellis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):524-525.
Uncaring Midwives.Margareta Eliasson, Gisela Kainz & Iréne von Post - 2008 - Nursing Ethics 15 (4):500-511.
Two Mothers in Law and Fact.Robert Leckey - 2013 - Feminist Legal Studies 21 (1):1-19.
FRom “motheRs oF the nation” to “motheRs oF the Race”.Eugenic Rhetoric - 2012 - In Elizabeth A. Flynn, Patricia J. Sotirin & Ann P. Brady (eds.), Feminist rhetorical resilience. Logan: Utah State University Press. pp. 181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
15 (#952,673)

6 months
8 (#371,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sarah LaChance Adams
University of North Florida

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references