Psychological conflict and human nature: The case of behaviourism and cognition

A reasonable choice between Skinner's and Chomsky's theories requires reference to a conception of human nature. It is explained in detail why this is so, in the context of an analysis of what it is to ‘choose’ a theory. This account helps to explain the unity and coherence of the science, methodology, conception of science, object of scientific inquiry and views towards control of each of Skinner and Chomsky, and thereby explains the chasm which separates the parties to their respective programs. The analysis given implies that, in a precise sense, the theory-choice is implicated in value-judgments
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1980.tb00012.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,205
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Mentalistic Problems in Cicourel's Cognitive Sociology.Bruce N. Waller - 1982 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12 (2):177–200.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #327,134 of 2,154,092 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,092 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums