Philosophical Studies 163 (1):77-83 (2013)

Authors
Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College
Abstract
This article responds to Janet Kourany’s proposal, in Philosophy of Science after Feminism, that scientific practices be held to the ideal of ‘socially responsible science’, to produce results that are not only cognitively sound, but also significant in the light of values ‘that can be morally justified’. Kourany also urges the development of ‘contextualized philosophy of science’—of which feminist philosophy of science is exemplary—that is ‘politically engaged’ and ‘activist’, ‘informed by analyses of the actual ways in which science interacts with the wider society in which it occurs, the ways in which science is shaped by and in turn shapes society’, and that can contribute to understanding both the cognitive and social dimensions of science. Although I share Kourany’s commitment to contextualized philosophy of science, I question her proposed ideal of ‘socially responsible science’ and the grounds she provides for adopting it. My argument leads me to defend rehabilitating the traditional ideal of the ‘neutrality’ of science, which I reinterpret as the ideal of ‘inclusiveness and evenhandedness’
Keywords Neutrality  Socially responsible science  Science as value free  Responsibility of scientists
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-0074-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reflections on Science and Technoscience.Hugh Lacey - 2012 - Scientiae Studia 10 (SPE):103-128.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A New Direction for Science and Values.Daniel J. Hicks - 2014 - Synthese 191 (14):3271-95.
Can the Science of Well-Being Be Objective?Anna Alexandrova - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):421-445.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Science Cannot Be Value-Free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.
A Successor to the Realism/Antirealism Question.Janet A. Kourany - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):101.
Getting Philosophy of Science Socially Connected.Janet A. Kourany - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):991-1002.
Replacing the Ideal of Value-Free Science.Janet A. Kourany - 2008 - In Martin Carrier, Don Howard & Janet A. Kourany (eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 87--111.
Science, Values, and the Value of Science.Noretta Koertge - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):57.
Socially Responsible Science and the Unity of Values.Miriam Solomon - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):331-338.
Science Without Laws.Ronald N. Giere - 1999 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-19

Total views
100 ( #111,009 of 2,462,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,366 of 2,462,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes