Philosophical Studies 163 (1):77-83 (2013)
AbstractThis article responds to Janet Kourany’s proposal, in Philosophy of Science after Feminism, that scientific practices be held to the ideal of ‘socially responsible science’, to produce results that are not only cognitively sound, but also significant in the light of values ‘that can be morally justified’. Kourany also urges the development of ‘contextualized philosophy of science’—of which feminist philosophy of science is exemplary—that is ‘politically engaged’ and ‘activist’, ‘informed by analyses of the actual ways in which science interacts with the wider society in which it occurs, the ways in which science is shaped by and in turn shapes society’, and that can contribute to understanding both the cognitive and social dimensions of science. Although I share Kourany’s commitment to contextualized philosophy of science, I question her proposed ideal of ‘socially responsible science’ and the grounds she provides for adopting it. My argument leads me to defend rehabilitating the traditional ideal of the ‘neutrality’ of science, which I reinterpret as the ideal of ‘inclusiveness and evenhandedness’
Similar books and articles
The source and status of values for socially responsible science.Matthew J. Brown - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):67-76.
Meeting the challenges to socially responsible science: reply to Brown, Lacey, and Potter.Janet A. Kourany - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):93-103.
The Ideal of Socially Responsible Science: Reply to Dupré, Rolin, Solomon, and Giere.Janet A. Kourany - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):344-352.
A philosophy of science for the twenty‐first century.Janet A. Kourany - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
Why science cannot be value-free.Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):33-41.
A successor to the realism/antirealism question.Janet A. Kourany - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):101.
Getting philosophy of science socially connected.Janet A. Kourany - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):991-1002.
Replacing the Ideal of Value-Free Science.Janet A. Kourany - 2008 - In Martin Carrier, Don Howard & Janet A. Kourany (eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 87--111.
Social science as a social institution: Neutrality and the politics of social research.Fred D'Agostino - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):396-405.
Three perspectives on neutrality and drift in molecular evolution.Michael R. Dietrich - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):666-677.
Socially Responsible Science and the Unity of Values.Miriam Solomon - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):331-338.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can the Science of Well-Being Be Objective?Anna Alexandrova - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (2):421-445.
Facing the Credibility Crisis of Science: On the Ambivalent Role of Pluralism in Establishing Relevance and Reliability.Martin Carrier - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):439-464.
Science, Respect for Nature, and Human Well-Being: Democratic Values and the Responsibilities of Scientists Today.Hugh Lacey - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (1):51-67.
References found in this work
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - Routledge.
Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy About Transgenic Crops.Hugh Lacey - 2005 - Lexington Books.
On the Interplay of the Cognitive and the Social in Scientific Practices.Hugh Lacey - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):977-988.