Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):134-135 (1995)

Authors
Hugh Lacey
Swarthmore College
Abstract
Teleological behaviorism, unlike Skinnerian behaviorism, recognizes that are needed to account adequately for human behavior, but it rejects the essential role in behavioral explanations of the subjective perspective of the agent. I argue that teleological behaviorism fails because of this rejection
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x00037742
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Altruism and Selfishness.Howard Rachlin - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):239-250.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
18 ( #607,806 of 2,504,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes