Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (2):101-106 (2012)

In his essay Tracy Lupher (henceforth, TL) is concerned with Robert Kane's (1984) version of the modal ontological argument (MOA). As he correctly points out, Kane's argument is valid only if the accessibility relation between possible worlds is assumed to be symmetric. TL's remarks pave the way to thinking that the MOA is intended to establish the existence of a perfect being as a matter of logical necessity. Moreover, given TL's undisputed supposition (even shared by Kane) that S5 - in which the accessibility relation is symmetric - captures the notion of logical necessity, the real issue becomes whether the premise of the MOA is true. Contrary to TL's main claim, the discussion thus shifts back from technical arguments for why the appropriate modal logic must have a symmetric accessibility relation to metaphysical, theological, or conceptual considerations about the notion of a perfect being itself. I argue that it is only due to such considerations that we even start to ponder the question of what modal logic is the appropriate one to choose.
Keywords modal ontological argument  philosophy of religion  metaphysics  modal logic  Robert Kane  Charles Hartshorne  Tracy Lupher
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0897-2346
DOI 10.5840/swphilreview201228245
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A New Introduction to Modal Logic.G. E. Hughes & M. J. Cresswell - 1996 - Studia Logica 62 (3):439-441.
The Modal Ontological Argument.R. Kane - 1984 - Mind 93 (371):336-350.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mechanized analysis of Anselm’s modal ontological argument.John Rushby - 2021 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 89 (2):135-152.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Waving at Schrödinger.Tracy Lupher - 2009 - Metascience 18 (3):463-467.
John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics. [REVIEW]Tracy Lupher - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (4):684-687.
Power Restructuring in China and the Soviet Union.Mark Lupher - 1992 - Theory and Society 21 (5):665-701.
Le Mémoire de Berlin de Destutt de Tracy (1806).Destutt de Tracy - 1933 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 116:161 - 187.


Added to PP index

Total views
161 ( #64,809 of 2,445,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #76,507 of 2,445,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes