Thesis Eleven 12 (1):145-155 (1985)
The second edition of Peter Lipton’s classic text contains new and important material on the causal model of explanation, the relation of inference to the best explanation to the Bayesian account of scientiﬁc reasoning, how exactly explanation guides inference, and why we ought to think that explanatory virtues are truth-tropic. Lipton is a wonderfully clear writer and a thorough and subtle philosopher, and his book is both a student-friendly introduction to the issues addressed, and essential reading for expert epistemologists and philosophers of science. Appeal to the notion of inference to the best explanation is ubiquitous in defences of scientiﬁc realism, but also elsewhere in philosophy where the explanatory virtues of theories are often the only purported grounds for accepting or rejecting them. Despite this, most authors are far from explicit about the details of inference to the best explanation, and Lipton’s book is the most sustained investigation of the relationship between explanation and inference currently available. Furthermore, Lipton is exemplary in his engagement with the problems his arguments face, and judiciously modest in his claims, though not so modest as to court triviality. Hence, the book is replete with interesting and careful arguments. Everyone interested in epistemology or philosophy of science ought to read this book. That said, in my discussion below I will concentrate on what I regard as problems with some of Lipton’s arguments. The model of explanation which he develops is contrastive and causal. Lipton is clear that he does not think all explanations are causal, but he does think that many are, especially in science, and
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Inference to the Best Explanation: Is It Really Different From Mill's Methods?Steven Rappaport - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (1):65-80.
The Role of Explanation in Understanding.K. Khalifa - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-187.
Book Review:Inference to the Best Explanation Peter Lipton. [REVIEW]Jesse Hobbs - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (4):679-.
Is Explanation a Guide to Inference? A Reply to Wesley Salmon.Peter Lipton - 2003 - In G. Hon & Sam S. Rakover (eds.), Explanation: Theoretical Approaches and Applications. Springer.
Alien Abduction: Inference to the Best Explanation and the Management of Testimony.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Episteme 4 (3):238-251.
On the Distinction Between Peirce's Abduction and Lipton's Inference to the Best Explanation.Daniel G. Campos - 2011 - Synthese 180 (3):419 - 442.
Review of Inference to the Best Explanation by Peter Lipton. [REVIEW]Lefteris Farmakis & Stephan Hartmann - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).
Reconsidering the Role of Inference to the Best Explanation in the Epistemology of Testimony.Axel Gelfert - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (4):386-396.
Précis of Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd Edition. [REVIEW]Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421–423.
Explanation, Inference, Testimony, and Truth: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Peter Lipton.Anjan Chakravartty - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (4):335-336.
Inference to the Best Explanation, by Peter Lipton. [REVIEW]Timothy D. Lyons - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):255-258.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads35 ( #147,657 of 2,172,022 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,022 )
How can I increase my downloads?