Cognitive Science 35 (2):297-329 (2011)
Neuropsychological studies suggest the existence of lateralized networks that represent categorical and coordinate types of spatial information. In addition, studies with neural networks have shown that they encode more effectively categorical spatial judgments or coordinate spatial judgments, if their input is based, respectively, on units with relatively small, nonoverlapping receptive fields, as opposed to units with relatively large, overlapping receptive fields. These findings leave open the question of whether interactive processes between spatial detectors and types of spatial relations can be modulated by spatial attention. We hypothesized that spreading the attention window to encompass an area that includes two objects promotes coordinate spatial relations, based on coarse coding by large, overlapping, receptive fields. In contrast, narrowing attention to encompass an area that includes only one of the objects benefits categorical spatial relations, by effectively parsing space. By use of a cueing procedure, the spatial attention window was manipulated to select regions of differing areas. As predicted, when the attention window was large, coordinate spatial transformations were noticed faster than categorical transformations; in contrast, when the attention window was relatively smaller, categorical spatial transformations were noticed faster than coordinate transformations. Another novel finding was that coordinate changes were noticed faster when cueing an area that included both objects as well as the empty space between them than when simultaneously cueing both areas including the objects while leaving the gap between them uncued
|Keywords||Spatial relations Coarse coding Attention cueing Attentional focus Coordinate Attentional scale Categorical Visual attention|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate.Stephen M. Kosslyn - 1994 - MIT Press.
Cortical Connections and Parallel Processing: Structure and Function.Dana H. Ballard - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (1):67.
Tracking Multiple Targets with Multifocal Attention.P. Cavanagh & G. Alvarez - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (7):349-354.
Citations of this work BETA
Flexible Visual Processing of Spatial Relationships.Steven L. Franconeri, Jason M. Scimeca, Jessica C. Roth, Sarah A. Helseth & Lauren E. Kahn - 2012 - Cognition 122 (2):210-227.
Similar books and articles
What is Attended in Spatial Attention?R. W. Kentridge, L. H. de-Wit & C. A. Heywood - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):105-111.
Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention.Shaun P. Vecera - 2000 - Brain and Mind 1 (3):353-384.
Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars.Noa Latham - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
Layers: A New Approach to Locating Objects in Space.Maureen Donnelly & Barry Smith - 2003 - In W. Kuhn M. F. Worboys & S. Timpf (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: Foundations of Geographic Information Science. Springer.
What Are Physical Objects?Ned Markosian - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
Types of Attention Matter for Awareness: A Study with Color Afterimages.Shruti Baijal & Narayanan Srinivasan - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (4):1039-1048.
The Effects of Spatial Attention on Unconscious, Affective, Location, and Feature Priming.Xavier Sonnerat - manuscript
Binding, Spatial Attention and Perceptual Awareness.Lynn C. Robertson - 2003 - Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (2):93-102.
Spatial Continuity and the Theory of Part and Whole: A Brentano Study.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1993 - Brentano Studien 4:11-24.
A Spatial Coding Analysis of the a-Not-B Error: What IS “Location at A”?Nora S. Newcombe - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):57-58.
Spatial Awareness, Alertness, and ADHD: The Re-Emergence of Unilateral Neglect with Time-on-Task.Melanie A. George, Veronika B. Dobler, Elaine Nicholls & Tom Manly - 2005 - Brain and Cognition 57 (3):264-275.
The Impossibility of Relations Between Non-Collocated Spatial Objects and Non-Identical Topological Spaces.Jeffrey Grupp - 2005 - Axiomathes 15 (1):85-141.
Added to index2010-10-13
Total downloads18 ( #269,295 of 2,164,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?